Better
Or Worse
This is a reprinted article from...
THE LONDON TIMES
September 27, 2005
The Times
Societies
worse off 'when they have God on their side'
By Ruth Gledhill, Religion Correspondent
RELIGIOUS
belief can cause damage to a society, contributing towards high murder rates,
abortion, sexual promiscuity and suicide, according to research published
today.
According
to the study, belief in and worship of God are not only unnecessary for a
healthy society but may actually contribute to social problems.
The
study counters the view of believers that religion is necessary to provide
the moral and ethical foundations of a healthy society.
It
compares the social peformance of relatively secular countries, such as Britain,
with the US, where the majority believes in a creator rather than the theory
of evolution. Many conservative evangelicals in the US consider Darwinism
to be a social evil, believing that it inspires atheism and amorality.
Many
liberal Christians and believers of other faiths hold that religious belief
is socially beneficial, believing that it helps to lower rates of violent
crime, murder, suicide, sexual promiscuity and abortion. The benefits of religious
belief to a society have been described as its “spiritual capital”.
But the study claims that the devotion of many in the US may actually contribute
to its ills.
The
paper, published in the Journal of Religion and Society, a US academic journal,
reports: “Many Americans agree that their churchgoing nation is an exceptional,
God-blessed, shining city on the hill that stands as an impressive example
for an increasingly sceptical world.
“In
general, higher rates of belief in and worship of a creator correlate with
higher rates of homicide, juvenile and early adult mortality, STD infection
rates, teen pregnancy and abortion in the prosperous democracies. “The
United States is almost always the most dysfunctional of the developing democracies,
sometimes spectacularly so.”
Gregory
Paul, the author of the study and a social scientist, used data from the International
Social Survey Programme, Gallup and other research bodies to reach his conclusions. He
compared social indicators such as murder rates, abortion, suicide and teenage
pregnancy. The
study concluded that the US was the world’s only prosperous democracy
where murder rates were still high, and that the least devout nations were
the least dysfunctional. Mr Paul said that rates of gonorrhoea in adolescents
in the US were up to 300 times higher than in less devout democratic countries.
The US also suffered from “ uniquely high” adolescent and adult
syphilis infection rates, and adolescent abortion rates, the study suggested. Mr
Paul said: “The study shows that England, despite the social ills it
has, is actually performing a good deal better than the USA in most indicators,
even though it is now a much less religious nation than America.”
He
said that the disparity was even greater when the US was compared with other
countries, including France, Japan and the Scandinavian countries. These nations
had been the most successful in reducing murder rates, early mortality, sexually
transmitted diseases and abortion, he added.
Mr
Paul delayed releasing the study until now because of Hurricane Katrina. He
said that the evidence accumulated by a number of different studies suggested
that religion might actually contribute to social ills. “I suspect that
Europeans are increasingly repelled by the poor societal performance of the
Christian states,” he added.
He
said that most Western nations would become more religious only if the theory
of evolution could be overturned and the existence of God scientifically proven.
Likewise, the theory of evolution would not enjoy majority support in the
US unless there was a marked decline in religious belief, Mr Paul said.
“The
non-religious, proevolution democracies contradict the dictum that a society
cannot enjoy good conditions unless most citizens ardently believe in a moral
creator. “The
widely held fear that a Godless citizenry must experience societal disaster
is therefore refuted.”